“History repeats itself, that’s one of the things that’s wrong with history.” -Clarence Darrow

The “Abused Wife Syndrome”

by | Apr 2, 2010 | Blog

Kashmiri separatists continue to accept Pakistani indignities with quiet grace

Compromising Ego (Editorial in the Kashmir Images)

With Pakistan once again selectively picking and choosing Kashmiri separatist leaders for invite to visit the country, separatist circles here are back to square-one, trying to convince Pakistan about their credentials.

While some are cross with Pakistan for ignoring them and are trying to put a brave face by pretending that ‘they don’t care less!’, there are others who have upped the ante to speak out that those who have got the invite are not the sole representatives of the Kashmiri people and “their cause”. But overall situation is that everybody is trying, in one way or the other, to communicate and convince Pakistan as well as the local audiences here that they should have been invited, they too deserved invite as much as anyone else.

Irrespective of who says what and how, it is an unfortunate reality of the separatist politics in Kashmir that Pakistan’s goodwill and pleasure remains top on the priority list. No individual or a group has outgrown the Pakistan’s influence thus far and the way things are moving, anything like that happening remains very unlikely in near future as well.

First, it was as if out of blue that Pakistan invited some separatist leaders for a visit to the country. Although such invites have come regularly in the past too, however, what was different this time was the invitation to some second-rung and quasi-separatists figures, whose hawkish views have attracted Pak attention of late. Moreover, as the move indicated, it was also aimed at cutting some old horses to size and, at the same time, giving some weightage to others to suit their own permutations and combinations in Kashmir. But then, owing to some other reasons, Pakistan reviewed its invitation and confined it to just three prominent names, weeding out others with as much ease as they were selected in the first place. This certainly has not gone down well with the parties and individuals here, who are visibly upset with the way the Pakistan has dealt the issue. They were neither happy with the selective invites nor have they been pleased with the selective cancellation of such bids. So they have started to publicly express their resentment. Although one remains unsure if such a tactic could change anything as for Pakistan’s game-plan goes, but one thing is for sure: for the Kashmiri separatist groups, Pakistan remains as powerful influence as ever and they are in no mood to forego it.

Despite over 20 years of fresh and hardcore experience in hindsight, the Kashmiri separatist leaders, instead of investing energies to develop rationalizations for their politics, keep looking towards Pakistan’s goodwill. Even as the separatism sentiment remains as strong as ever, those who claim to represent and personify it, remain insecure in this fast-changing world so much so that they cling to illusionary fixed points, which are very real to them. So strong remains this P-influence on this brand of politics that even the conversations are charted towards fixing one’s position vis-à-vis this strong focal point. They use revealing adjectives and attractive superlatives to justify their holier-than-thou positions, biases and slants, but unfortunately, very little care and attention is accorded to the individual and collective Kashmiri ego.

How can political leaders respect the dignity of an individual if they do not respect their own dignity? How can they believe in people if they do not believe in themselves? How can they convince people that they have it within themselves, that they have the power to stand up to win, if they do not believe if of themselves?